DoonboggleFrog

How to Eliminate Virtually all Chance of Nuclear Weapons Being Used:

2007-06-29T11:57:00.001-04:00

Get the nuclear powers, declared and otherwise, to agree to a verifiable disarmament schedule. At a minimum, this means the following nations must cooperate:

Russia ~10000 warheads

US ~6000 warheads

UK ~300 warheads

India ~300 warheads

Pakistan ~150 warheads

Israel ~150 warheads

France ~100 warheads

China ~50 warheads

North Korea >20 warheads

South Korea (Could probably deploy dozens within 6 months) (less if they are willing to piss people off)

Taiwan (Could probably deploy dozens within 6 months) (less if they are willing to piss people off)

Japan (Known/declared capability to deploy 80 within 6 months) (much less (5-10 days?) if they are willing to piss people off)

Iran (Suspected development program – might have a weapon by 2020—maybe 2012 if they are willing to risk war to do it.)

There are about 50 nations (including those above) with existing capabilities or even weapons-grade fissile material, but most have only small amounts and/or have no conceivable defense need for the weapons, so provoking the international community by withdrawing from the NPT would not be worth the weapons, and it would take long enough for them to make the weapons that an international response might have time to intervene.

Most of those countries will only agree to disarm conditional on US and Russian disarmament. Therefore, the US and Russia must take the lead and eliminate their own massive advantage before other countries begin in earnest.
The US and Russia should disarm down to 300-500 warheads each, and place those warheads under Chinese-quality safeguards.
The 7+ member 100+ warhead club should disarm together down to the 20-50 range of China and North Korea.
All ten nuclear powers should physically dismantle remaining warheads, but continue to maintain parts in operable condition.
The existing IAEA should be reorganized into an international distributor/licensor of nuclear power facilities and fuel. A fuel cycle that recycles fuel in such a way that no stage in the process produces a weapons-grade byproduct should be developed and become the world’s dominant fission energy technology. (several have been proposed that do this (which would be “Gen V” technology – currently most US reactors are “Gen III” or earlier – “Gen IV” reactors are coming online in several countries around the world: France, Japan, South Africa are the leaders, I think) These Gen V reactors would, like Gen IV, be physically incapable of meltdown, and consume 99% of the energy potential of the fuel – US Gen III reactors consume about 6%, which is why we have such a problem with nuclear waste.
The IAEA and member countries should systematically hunt down all fissile material – whether it is weapons-grade or not. Users of the material should be monitored, and it should be accounted for at least as carefully as we account for money and drugs. (being far more dangerous than either!)
Sometime in the distant future, when the ten nations decide on their own that they no longer need to maintain their remaining 20-50 weapons, they should be recycled into fuel at an IAEA-controlled facility.

PS: While the stories about missing nukes make good TV news, there have been very few cases where a complete weapon was “lost” or stolen. In all of the known cases, the weapon was recovered. A much bigger question is whether or not all of the radiological devices in the world are accounted for, and the answer is no. The USSR powered remote sensing posts (thousands of them!) with radiological batteries; Russia does not have complete records as to the whereabouts of these facilities, whether the batteries are still operable, and/or whether the radiation source has been removed. These are not weapons-grade materials, but do include plutonium, so we are talking about high-level dirty bomb potential. But by far the biggest supply of radioactive material is from hospitals in western countries – and the controls on those materials are minimal.

Visit Dewberry's website at www.dewberry.com

This email transmission may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this email message in error, notify the sender by email and delete the email without reading, copying or disclosing the email contents. The unauthorized use or dissemination of any confidential or privileged information contained in this email is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and intentionally intercept or forward this message to someone else, you may be subject to criminal and/or civil penalties. See 18 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.

Chalk and Aw...

2007-06-26T10:04:00.001-04:00

…would be a good name for an art gallery specializing in pastel drawings of puppies and kittens.

Purr...

2007-06-25T08:34:00.001-04:00

Pernicious persimmons perpetrated persnickety perfection.

A Couple Random Thoughts...

2007-06-19T09:16:00.001-04:00

If Wesley/The Dread Pirate Roberts was right when he said, “Life is pain, highness, anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something,” in The Princess Bride, then painkillers (drugs, therapies, woo, etc) would be a multi-billion-dollar industry whose marketing would consist of trying to convince people that they are the only ones suffering, and just buying this product will solve their…

…wait, what?

Oh, right – we live in the world where those things are a multi-billion-dollar industry.

Proof that pirates are the source of all truly valuable wisdom?

******

If you draw a square, negative 20 feet on a side, its area is 400 sq.ft. Now imagine that you tack said square as an addition to a house. Does it make the house bigger or smaller?

Obviously, it has a positive area; therefore, it must increase the size of the house. However, its perimeter is negative 80, therefore, the perimeter of the house is likely reduced by at least 60 feet.

Now if only we could figure out how to build a negative-dimensioned wall…

Iron-Age Americans with War Elephants?

2007-06-13T18:31:00.000-04:00

I recently read Paul Martin's "Twilight of the Mammoths", and a year or so ago, I read Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel" and "Collapse". Thinking about these three books made me wonder about how different the history of the world would be if (assuming Diamond's and Martin's respective hypothesises are correct) the Clovis people (or some subset of them) had domesticated horses, camels, and/or other late Pleistocene species native to this continent.

If the Europeans had arrived in the 15th century and found advanced civilizations -- heavily armed, equipped with horses, camels, and maybe even war-mammoths, how different would that catastrophic first contact have been? Europeans still would have had their (unintentional for the most part) ultimate weapon: smallpox, to which the Americans would have had no immunity. But it is likely that the Americans would have had equally lethal diseases to transfer back to the Europeans.

Now obviously, this is a significant change in world history, and we do not even know if the animals in America had the right behavioral quirks to make them domesticatable. But if they were, and if they had been domesticated, those Clovis paleolithic nomads would have a massive advantage over other peoples in the Americas.

A friend pointed out that people need an impetus to develop technology. It is not enough to merely have access to the right materials and time. Diamond only briefly touched on this – the primary way he did touch on it was the fact that cultures that lived on “isles of plenty” quickly reverted to a pre-agricultural lifestyle. The reason for this “reversion” is that early-stage agriculture is backbreaking labor – if a society doesn’t need the tech to survive, they won’t bother.

We know that pre-Colombian Americans did need agriculture to survive. It was independently invented at least twice in the Americas, possibly more, and contrary to the common image of the Americans as barely (if at all) civilized, most of North America was settled by agrarian nation-states until the late the 1400s. In fact, the arrival of Europeans caused many of those states to dissintegrate even before the English began building colonies. English fishing fleets had been re-supplying on the coast of what is now New England since the 1550's. The Jamestown and Plymouth colonies found depopulated and even completely vacant villages -- why? The smallpox epidemic that eventually would wipe out 95% of the pre-Columbian population of the Americas began at first contact 70 years before, not when the English finally decided to build colonies in the early 17th century.

Given that America was not rich enough to support the population without agriculture, it is not out of line to think that some subset of the Clovis peoples could have domesticated American *Horse, *Camel, *Cow, *Goat, species that were extinct by the time the Europeans arrived in our time line. Especially since they did domesticate the dog, and their descendants re-domesticated feral Spanish horses so quickly. The biggest difficulty might be that Pleistocene America probably was rich enough to make agriculture unnecesary. (All those millions of bison, elephants, sloths, and horses who had never seen a predator as unassuming, but nevertheless deadly, as humans)

Later on, the primary impetus to develop technology is a combination of two things: first, competition for land and resources with neighbors, and second, development of internal divisions of labor – specialization becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy – once you have a XYZ class, it becomes difficult to imagine life/civilization without it. Eventually XYZ breaks into specialties W and A, and now you have two classes of specialists instead of one, and neither are out plowing the south 40. Agricultural producers have to accelerate to meet the added demand.

The key shift I see in history required to make my what-if work is that the extinction event needs to be either dramatically slowed down, or the animals have to be domesticated within a century or two of arrival in the Americas. Paul Martin argues that the fossil record pretty much conclusively shows that all of the species that went extinct in the Clovis era did so within a few centuries to 1000 years at the outside of the human arrival – in other words, the biggest obstacle to domestication was having the realization that there was any reason to bother. At first the animals were unafraid of man and so numerous that they could go out and get a meal any time they wanted one (and the evidence suggests that the Clovis people had this “fast food” attitude: the few known kill sites in the fossil record are sites of massive overkill.). By the time they were scarce, it may have been too late to save most of the species in question.

If you can get past that hurdle, I see no reason (especially given the resource-richness of North America) that the Europeans would not have encountered societies at least as advanced as iron age, and really – I tend to think more advanced is likely. Remember there is not that big a leap from the late Roman period to the early renaissance – in several ways the Romans were more advanced than 15th century Spain. The American West has vast reserves of copper, gold, silver, and tin, so a bronze age is a virtual certainty. Once a culture has the skills to make bronze, it is not that big a step to realizing that iron is available and even better than bronze – and I tend to think it would have the same driving force the discovery did in Europe – war. I don’t visualize one vast American empire. I visualize an America much like 15th Century Europe, i.e., several nascent nation-states verging on empire (i.e., Britain and Spain), several future nation-states still in a tribal/feudal stage (i.e., Germany and Italy), and the rest of the continent somewhere in between those situations (or no-man’s lands between nations at war.)

I don’t think that South America would have fared as well, unless it was colonized by North American Empires – South America has the disadvantage of a North-South axis requiring multiple types of agriculture across the continent – not so in North America.

*Horses and Camels evolved here and migrated to Eurasia & Africa. There were half a dozen or so species of bison – it is not unreasonable to assume that at least one of those species could have been domesticated as their Eurasian relatives were. Goat = a lowland species related to the mountain goat and bighorn sheep that still exist out west.

There are also the wild cards: elephants, (about which we know little, since less than half of the ancient family still exists) sloths (ranging in size from large dog to mammoth-sized) (about which we know almost nothing – could they have been tamed as a meat/milk source? Certainly an animal as slow as a sloth could have been captured, and might have put up with captivity if it was provided with a steady diet.) Giant beavers and Armadillos (I can’t imagine a domestic use for these, but certainly impressive armor could have been made by a Neolithic people from an armadillo the size of a Volkswagen beetle.

Here I am, Blogging from work -- try and stop me!

2007-06-12T11:39:00.001-04:00

Ed the Frog does not like his job. Even when he has assignments that (on the face of things) should be enjoyable (rendered color exhibits!) they are no fun.

Why is he writing in the third person?

Excellent question. He is writing in the third person because he wants to.

Why is the sky orange?

Excellent question. The answer is 42.

Are you going to make a point or just string together non sequiturs until you hit send?

How dare you ask such an impertinent question?

I don’t know, it just seemed like the thing to ask.

If jumping off a bridge “just seemed like the thing to do” would you do it?

Uh… pretty much by definition.

Wrong answer! Go on, be gone, I’m done with you!

Hello World!

2007-06-09T08:50:00.001-04:00

This is not a post!